Government Corruption

Ralph Nader Radio Hour

.

Crooked Prosecutors – RNRH

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in corruption, Government | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Auto Safety

Citizens for Reliable and Safe Highways (CRASH)

Ralph Nader Radio Hour

.

Auto Safety – RNRH

TRUCK SAFETY ISSUES – CR

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in Auto Safety | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Public Outreach Flier

As you can see, my brochure theme is: multi-national corporations are not human but more like ALIENS who do not care about humans! Most of our politicians have capitulated to these ALIENS who are destructively feeding on us humans and the environment.

I am hoping my provocative brochure will create enough lasting interest and controversary to be a discussion keeper. I am hoping the brochure will help introduce “unknown” me to the voters as someone who will shake up a political system that seems to lack concern for the average person.

I have over 20,000 brochures right now. I have also obtained walking maps from the election office to supplement my existing maps. I plan to start distributing these brochures door to door the 2nd week of August. I hope to distribute an average of 2000-2500 a week. Hopefully I will need at least an additional 10,000 for mailing and door to door the last month of October before the November 8 election.

If you could make a small donation toward the costs of these brochures and a possible ballot statement, I would greatly appreciate it. Donate here! Or on my campaign website!

.

.

.

2022 Campaign Brochure – Michael E. Kerr

.

2022-08-05 Fundraising Appeal

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in activism | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Medical-Industrial Complex

Sources & Organizations

Ralph Nader Radio Hour

Specific Information

Corporate Health Care – RNRH

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in corporate accountability, Medicare for All | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

CA Proposition 47 (Prop 47) November 5, 2014

2014 California Proposition 47 -Wikipedia

Proposition 47, also known by its ballot title Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute, was a referendum passed by voters in the state of California on November 4, 2014. The measure was also referred to by its supporters as the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act.[2] It recategorized some nonviolent offenses as misdemeanors, rather than felonies, as they had previously been categorized.

The crimes affected were:

  • Shoplifting, where the value of property stolen does not exceed $950
  • Grand theft, where the value of the stolen property does not exceed $950
  • Receiving stolen property, where the value of the property does not exceed $950
  • Forgery, where the value of forged check, bond or bill does not exceed $950
  • Fraud, where the value of the fraudulent check, draft or order does not exceed $950
  • Writing a bad check, where the value of the check does not exceed $950
  • Personal use of most illegal drugs (Below a certain threshold of weight)[3]

Back to Prop47 – LA Public Defender

Proposition 47 (Prop 47) was a ballot measure passed by California voters on November 5, 2014. The law made some non-violent property crimes, where the value does not exceed $950, into misdemeanors. It also made some simple drug possession offenses into misdemeanors. It also provides that past convictions for these charges may be reduced to a misdemeanor by a court. Under Prop 47, you may qualify for a reduction from a felony to a misdemeanor for some of the following offenses:

  • Certain Forgeries
  • Commercial Burglary
  • Petty Theft with Priors
  • Bad Check
  • Grand Theft Crimes
  • Possession of Stolen Property
  • Possession of a Controlled Substance

Individuals eligible for resentencing/ reclassification under Proposition 47 must file their applications/petitions by November 4, 2022. If you think you may qualify for Prop 47 legal relief, please complete our intake form by clicking here, or you may also visit one of our Public Defender offices, here.

California Proposition 47, Reduced Penalties for Some Crimes Initiative (2014) – Ballotpedia was on the ballot as an initiated state statute in California on November 4, 2014. It was approved.

Proposition 47 Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute.

Posted in crime, criminal justice, legal system, legislation | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

California Assembly Bill AB 109

AB-109 Criminal justice alignment – CA Legislative Information

PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT (AB 109) – SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS

AB 109 Realignment in California

17 Most Notable AB 109 Pros and Cons

The goal of AB 109 is to divert people who are convicted of felonies that are not defined as serious to local country jails. That reserves more space for those convicted of serious felonies at state prisons, such as sexually-based offenses or violent crimes. The purpose of this realignment was to reduce the issues of overcrowding that were occurring at the state prison level.

The bill took effect on October 1, 2011. Since its initial creation, AB 109 has been altered by AB 116, AB 117, and AB 118.

CA ASSEMBLY BILL 109 (AB 109) -Placer County

Overview

In April 2011, the California Legislature and Governor Brown passed Assembly Bill 109 (AB 109), which shifted responsibility for certain populations of offenders from the state to the counties. Assembly Bill 109 establishes the California Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 which allows for current non-violent, non-serious, and non-high risk sex offenders, after they are released from California State prison, to be supervised at the local County level. Instead of reporting to state parole officers, these offenders report to local county probation officers.

Posted in California State Assembly, legislation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Health Care – Antibiotics

Sources & Organizations

ReAct

Specific Information

National Action Plans on Antimicrobial Resistance – RA

News and Views _ RA

Toolbox – RA

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Share this:

Posted in health, health care | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

2020-11-03 California Proposition 20

California Proposition 20 was a proposed initiated state statute on the ballot in the 2020 California elections. This initiative would have added more crimes to the list of non-violent felonies for which early parole is restricted, and would have required DNA collection for certain misdemeanors.[1]

According to its ballot summary, Proposition 20 would have

  • limited access to parole programs established for non-violent offenders who have completed the full term of their primary offense by eliminating eligibility for certain offenses;
  • changed the standards and requirements related to Parole in California;
  • authorized felony charges in cases of retail theft where the value of stolen goods is between $250 and $950; and
  • would have required individuals convicted of certain misdemeanors to submit DNA to a state database.

Proposition 20 was decisively rejected by 62% of Californians, a margin of 24 percentage points. Observers partly attributed its failure to the George Floyd protests bringing negative attention to punitive criminal justice policies

Proposition 20 | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State

CA Legislative Analyst’s – Proposition 20

RESTRICTS PAROLE FOR CERTAIN OFFENSES CURRENTLY CONSIDERED TO BE NON-VIOLENT. AUTHORIZES FELONY SENTENCES FOR CERTAIN OFFENSES CURRENTLY TREATED ONLY AS MISDEMEANORS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

Yes/No Statement

YES vote on this measure means: People who commit certain theft-related crimes (such as repeat shoplifting) could receive increased penalties (such as longer jail terms). Additional factors would be considered for the state’s process for releasing certain inmates from prison early. Law enforcement would be required to collect DNA samples from adults convicted of certain misdemeanors.

NO vote on this measure means: Penalties for people who commit certain theft-related crimes would not be increased. There would be no change to the state’s process for releasing certain inmates from prison early. Law enforcement would continue to be required to collect DNA samples from adults only if they are arrested for a felony or required to register as sex offenders or arsonists.

2020-10-28 Reimagining Criminal Justice: The Lasting Effects of the 3 Strikes
Law and Proposition 20
My uncle has spent 25 years in prison because of California’s Three Strike’s Law. Advocates of Proposition 20 want keep him there longer.

Proposition 20: Crackdown on crime The Basics

California

California Quick Guide to Proposition3 _Prop 20

2020-10-16 Prop. 20 sparks debate over effects of criminal justice reform in California

Now a group of prosecutors and law enforcement leaders has placed Proposition 20 on the November statewide ballot, which would expand the list of felonies for which the convicted are ineligible for early parole; increase penalties for repeat shoplifters; and collect DNA samples from adults convicted of some misdemeanors.

Proponents argue that it is needed to fix flaws in past measures that they say are putting the public’s safety at risk, including the early release of potentially violent criminals. But opponents of the measure, who include civil rights leaders, Gov. Gavin Newsom and former Gov. Jerry Brown, say it wrongly rolls back necessary criminal justice reforms as crime has declined in recent years.

2020-08-26 No on Proposition 20, a heavy-handed reaction to justice reforms

Over the last decade, California has undertaken significant criminal justice reforms aimed at reducing the state’s prison population.

In 2011, the year the U.S. Supreme Court ordered California to reduce its prison population, the Legislature approved Assembly Bill 109, which shifted greater responsibility for non-violent, non-serious and non-sexual offenders from the state level to the county level. This was followed by Proposition 47 in 2014, which reduced a handful of low-level drug and property crimes from felonies to misdemeanors, and Proposition 57 in 2016, which incentivizes prisoners to participate in rehabilitative programming.

Each step of the way, police unions opposed reforms, arguing they would make California less safe. The evidence of this in aggregate is mixed at best, with California experiencing historically low levels of crime.

Researchers in 2016 flagged increases in some property crimes, particularly car theft, following the passage of AB109 as potentially linked to the law. The impact of Prop. 47 on crime rates has been contested, with researchers at the University of California, Irvine determining it had no impact on crime rates, while the Public Policy Institute of California determined it may have contributed to an increase in larceny.

2020-11-03 Prop. 20, which would have toughened sentencing in criminal cases, is rejected by California voters

Posted in criminal justice, criminal law | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bilderberg Group

The Bilderberg meeting (also known as the Bilderberg Group) is an annual conference established in 1954 to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. The group’s agenda, originally to prevent another world war, is now defined as bolstering a consensus around free market Western capitalism and its interests around the globe. Participants include political leadersexperts from industryfinanceacademia, and the media, numbering between 120 and 150. Attendees are entitled to use information gained at meetings, but not attribute it to a named speaker. This is to encourage candid debate, while maintaining privacy – a provision that has fed conspiracy theories from both left and right.

Criticisms and conspiracy theories

Proponents of Bilderberg conspiracy theories in the United States include individuals and groups such as the John Birch Society,[40][44] political activist Phyllis Schlafly,[44] writer Jim Tucker,[45] political activist Lyndon LaRouche,[46] conspiracy theorist Alex Jones,[2][47][48] and politician Jesse Ventura, who made the Bilderberg group a topic of a 2009 episode of his TruTV series Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura.[49] Non-American proponents include Lithuanian writer Daniel Estulin[50] and British politician Nigel Farage.[51]

Concerns about lobbying have arisen.[52][53] Ian Richardson sees Bilderberg as the transnational power elite, “an integral, and to some extent critical, part of the existing system of global governance“, that is “not acting in the interests of the whole”.[54] An article in The Guardian in June 2017 criticized the world view expressed in an agenda published by the Bilderberg group.[55]

Partly because of its working methods to ensure strict privacy and secrecy,[35] the Bilderberg Group has been criticised for its lack of transparency and accountability.[36] The undisclosed nature of the proceedings has given rise to several conspiracy theories,[37][17][38] which have been popular at both extremes of the political spectrum, although there is disagreement about the exact nature of the group’s intentions. Some on the left accuse the Bilderberg group of conspiring to impose capitalist domination,[39] while some on the right have accused the group of conspiring to impose a world government and planned economy.[40]

19 Shocking Facts And Theories About The Bilderberg Group

The first Bilderberg meeting was held during 1954. The organization was founded with the intent to create powerful connections between European countries and North Americans. The meeting is a secretive, informal discussion about global trends with open communication between the elite members of the world who have massive influence in world affairs.

No statements of any kind are allowed to be made to the press regarding the proceedings or what is talked about at the meeting. There are no meeting minutes taken and no reports of the discussions or official statement about the discussions is produced or made. Anything learned at the meeting can be freely used by any of the members; however, no one is permitted to talk about it.

More than 400 heavily armed guards are there protect the attendees. The event space is hardened with physical barricades and high levels of security. It is this level of high security combined with the extreme secrecy, which makes the conspiracy theorists go wild with speculation about what they actually do at the Bilderberg meetings.

Only those who are invited are permitted to attend the meeting. Everyone invited sees a major career boost after attending a Bilderberg meeting. Bill Clinton attended while he was the Governor of Arkansas and within a year he was President of the United States. Tony Blair became Prime Minister of the UK, four years after going to his first Bilderberg meeting.

The co-founders of the Bilderberg Group were two historical figures with checkered backgrounds. They were Prince Bernhard from the Netherlands and Józef Retinger who was a political advisor, originally from Poland, who worked with the Vatican.

The Bilderberg Group publishes on its website a simple list of the items that will be discussed at an upcoming meeting, without giving any further details. The Bilderberg Group also publishes a list of the attendees. Members of the Bilderberger Group are some of the richest, most powerful, and most famous people in the world.  The Bilderberg Group is a conspiracy theorist’s dream scenario. Since no one except the attendees of the Bilderberg meetings knows what is said or done, anything imaginable might be going on.

Paul Warburg founded the Council on Foreign Relations during 1921 and David Rockefeller founded the Trilateral Commission. These organizations are similar to the Bilderberg Group. David Rockefeller is a member of all three. Just like the Bilderberg Group, the extent and reach of the powerful members of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission have influenced the globe for decades. It makes very little difference who is the President in the White House because these power brokers are the ones really in charge. In most cases, without their approval and support, there is no way to get elected.

The common goal of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group is the creation of a one world government with a central global financial system. The two groups work together. The Council on Foreign Relations works on the U.S. side with the Bilderberg Group working on the European side. In order to create a new world economy, the Bilderbergers believe that they need to destroy the separate national ones. They plan to achieve this by causing either a long depression that generates decades of decline and poverty or they plan to use sudden intense economic shocks. These shocks will be similar to the 2006 American housing market collapse. This will allow them to re-set national economies into a new alignment with reduced national sovereignty and increased efficiency.

The Bilderberg Group understands that the destruction of the U.S. dollar is necessary in order to replace it with a world currency. The bankers have been eroding the value of the U.S. dollar for a very long time. A dollar is worth less than 2% of what a U.S. dollar was worth one hundred years ago. U.S. government officials have been participants in this process, making a mountain of debt that can never be paid back. 

The enormous growth in the global population and its continued increase is not sustainable over the long term. One way the Bilderberg Group can reduce the human population is by causing pandemics. Biological agents can be intentionally used to cause a major outbreak of illness, which kills millions. Many of the super elite have so little concern for the masses that they consider this the same as culling a herd of animals.

Media is controlled very heavily by very few companies. Governments actively participate in the censorship of media, as well as promote disinformation if it serves their purpose.  These are propaganda campaigns that are carefully designed to create public opinion in order to protect corporate power.

The Bilderberg Group starts its process to build its empire by the creation of Trade Zones and Trade Agreement that benefits the multinational corporations. They have little interest in any improving the economic levels for the lower classes as long as there are enough of them are able to buy their products. The jobs all move to the places with the lowest wages, no benefits, and bad working conditions. This allows the multinational corporations to maximize profits.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books – Consumer & Corporate Issues

Action for a Change: A Student’s Manual for Public Interest Organizing – Ralph Nader In this action-oriented manual, Ralph Nader answers the plea of college students: What can we do about pollution and consumer injustice? How can students and other citizens work to get things done in their communities and states? A step by step guide is offered for forming Public Interest Research Groups (PIRG) like Nader’s in Washington, D. C., and the Nader-inspired PIRG’s in Minnesota and Oregon. Attorney Donald Ross shows in detail how to initiate public interest and research groups, how to marshal talent, how to finance the group, and how to put it to work. The PIRG approach is advocated to bring about “initiatory democracy,” a full-time citizenry, aware, informed, and constantly acting upon social, economic, and political institutions in the public interest. (BL)

Animal Envy: A Fable Ralph Nader’s newest work of the imagination, Animal Envy, is a fable about the kinds of intelligences that are all around us in other animals. What would animals tell us—about themselves, about us—if there were a common language among all animal species? A bracingly simple idea, one that has been used before in books like George Orwell’s Animal Farm and E. B. White’s Charlotte’s Web among others, but never like this.

Breaking Through Power – Ralph Nader In Breaking Through Power, Nader draws from a lifetime waging—and often winning—David vs. Goliath battles against big corporations and the United States government. This is classic Ralph Nader, a crystallization of the core political beliefs and commitments that have driven his lifetime of advocacy for greater democracy.

Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed-In Dangers of The American Automobile – Ralph Nader We picked the 100 best and most influential written in English since 1923, the beginning ofTIME … magazine” Ralph Nader’s book Unsafe at Any Speed is number 21 on the list! Unsafe at Any Speed was published in 1965. It is Ralph’s first book. And it was the book that launched the modern consumer movement.

Unstoppable: THE EMERGING LEFT-RIGHT ALLIANCE TO DISMANTLE THE CORPORATE STATE – Ralph Nader We are at one of the most pivotal moments in our country’s political history: Americans are more disillusioned with their political leaders than ever before and large majorities of citizens tell pollsters that big corporations have too much political power. The ever-tightening influence of big business on the mainstream media, elections and our local, state, and federal governments, have caused many Americans to believe they have no political voice.

.

Books by the Issues

Documentary by the Issues

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in books | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment