Vaccine

Sources & Organizations

Children’s Health Defense

Specific Information

eBook Sign-Up—Vaccine Mandates: An Erosion of Civil Rights?- CHD

How Will We Know That a COVID-19 Vaccine is Safe? – CHD

RFK, Jr. Urges FDA to Slow Down COVID Vaccine Approval Process – CHD

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in Children, health care, vaccine | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Children Healthcare

Sources & Organizations

Children’s Health Defense

ReAct

Specific Information

Antibiotic resistance – undoing progress in maternal and child health – RA

DC Law Would Give Vaccine Decisions to Kids 11 or Older Without Parents’ Knowledge or Consent – CHD

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in Children, health care, vaccine | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Puerto Rico

Sources & Organizations

Center for Popular Democracy

Specific Information

ORGANIZING FOR A JUST RECOVERY IN PUERTO RICO AND BEYOND – CPD

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in Puerto Rica | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Healthcare Justice

Sources & Organizations

Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR)

Center for Popular Democracy

Do No Harm Coalition

Specific Information

HealthcareWorkers – CEPR

Manifesto – DNH

ORGANIZING FOR HEALTHCARE JUSTICE – CPD

Political Education – DNH

Street Medic Training – DNH

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in health care, justice | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Progressive Legislation

Sources & Organizations

Center for Popular Democracy

Contra Costa Move-On

Specific Information

FEDERAL ADVOCACY: FIGHTING BACK & FIGHTING FORWARD – CPD

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in legislation | Tagged | Leave a comment

Unemployment

Sources & Organizations

Center for Popular Democracy

Economic Policy Institute (EPI)

Specific Information

EXTEND UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE TO SUPPORT WORKERS AND KEEP THE ECONOMY AFLOAT – CPD

Jobs and Unemployment – EPI

Unemployment

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in unemployment | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Civil Rights

Civil Rights Struggle – U.S. Constitution 1787 to Capital Insurrection

Books – Civil Rights/Race

Howie Hawkins on Civil Rights

Civil Rights and Equal Rights

.

Issues Index (www.kerr2020.com)

from Creating Better World

Posted in civil rights | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Civil Rights Struggle – U.S. Constitution 1787 to Capital Insurrection

The Constitution And Slavery   Prior to the 13th Amendment, did the Constitution support slavery?   

SLAVERY, SECTIONALISM, AND THE CONSTITUTION OF 1787  The Constitution’s compromises added an element of complexity to the Constitution that defies any effort to reduce it to Twitter-sized proslavery or antislavery soundbites that implicate or exonerate the founders.  

Women’s Suffrage Movement In 1848, a group of abolitionist activists—mostly women, but some men—gathered in Seneca Falls, New York to discuss the problem of women’s rights. They were invited there by the reformers Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott.  Most of the delegates to the Seneca Falls Convention agreed: American women were autonomous individuals who deserved their own political identities. 

“We hold these truths to be self-evident,” proclaimed the Declaration of Sentiments that the delegates produced, “that all men and women are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” 

The Capitol Attack of 1861  Very similar situation as was 2020-21 situation   

The American Civil War was a civil war in the United States from 1861 to 1865, fought between northern states loyal to the Union and southern states that had seceded to form the Confederate States of America.[e] The civil war began as a result of the unresolved controversy of the enslavement of black people in the southern states.  

After Abraham Lincoln won the November 1860 presidential election on an anti-slavery platform, an initial seven slave states declared their secession from the country to form the Confederacy. War broke out in April 1861 when secessionist forces attacked Fort Sumter in South Carolina, just over a month after Lincoln’s inauguration. An additional four slave states joined the Confederacy in the following two months. The Confederacy grew to control at least a majority of territory in those eleven states (out of the 34 U.S. states in February 1861), and it claimed the additional states of Kentucky and Missouri by assertions from native secessionists fleeing Union authority. These states were given full representation in the Confederate Congress throughout the Civil War. The two remaining slave states, Delaware and Maryland, were invited to join the Confederacy, but Delaware declined and nothing substantial developed in Maryland due to intervention by federal troops.  

Abraham Lincoln’s Assassination  On the evening of April 14, 1865, John Wilkes Booth, a famous actor and Confederate sympathizer, assassinated President Abraham Lincoln at Ford’s Theatre in Washington, D.C. The attack came only five days after Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered his massive army at Appomattox Court House, Virginia, effectively ending the American Civil War. 

How Presidential Assassinations Changed U.S. Politics The assassination of President Lincoln was just one part of a larger plot to decapitate the federal government of the U.S. after the Civil War.  Lincoln never lived to enact this policy. He died the following morning on April 15, 1865. His successor Andrew Johnson assumed office and presided over Reconstruction.  Johnson, a Congressman and former slaveholder from Tennessee – and the only Southern senator to remain loyal to the Union during the Civil War – favored lenient measures in readmitting Southern states to the Union during the Reconstruction era.  A proponent of states’ rights, Johnson granted amnesty to most former Confederates and allowed Southern states to elect new governments. As a result, new state governments formed across the South and enacted “black codes.”   These restrictive measures were designed to repress the recently freed slave population. Soon, many African Americans had little choice but to continue working on Southern plantations. 

Andrew Johnson and Presidential Reconstruction   At the end of May 1865, President Andrew Johnson announced his plans for Reconstruction, which reflected both his staunch Unionism and his firm belief in states’ rights. In Johnson’s view, the southern states had never given up their right to govern themselves, and the federal government had no right to determine voting requirements or other questions at the state level. Under Johnson’s Presidential Reconstruction, all land that had been confiscated by the Union Army and distributed to the formerly enslaved people by the army or the Freedmen’s Bureau (established by Congress in 1865) reverted to its prewar owners. Apart from being required to uphold the abolition of slavery (in compliance with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution), swear loyalty to the Union and pay off war debt, southern state governments were given free rein to rebuild themselves.   

As a result of Johnson’s leniency, many southern states in 1865 and 1866 successfully enacted a series of laws known as the “black codes,” which were designed to restrict freed Black peoples’ activity and ensure their availability as a labor force. These repressive codes enraged many in the North, including numerous members of Congress, which refused to seat congressmen and senators elected from the southern states.

In early 1866, Congress passed the Freedmen’s Bureau and Civil Rights Bills and sent them to Johnson for his signature. The first bill extended the life of the bureau, originally established as a temporary organization charged with assisting refugees and formerly enslaved people, while the second defined all persons born in the United States as national citizens who were to enjoy equality before the law. After Johnson vetoed the bills–causing a permanent rupture in his relationship with Congress that would culminate in his impeachment in 1868–the Civil Rights Act became the first major bill to become law over presidential veto.  

@Radical Reconstruction   After northern voters rejected Johnson’s policies in the congressional elections in late 1866, Radical Republicans in Congress took firm hold of Reconstruction in the South. The following March, again over Johnson’s veto, Congress passed the Reconstruction Act of 1867, which temporarily divided the South into five military districts and outlined how governments based on universal (male) suffrage were to be organized. The law also required southern states to ratify the 14th Amendment, which broadened the definition of citizenship, granting “equal protection” of the Constitution to formerly enslaved people, before they could rejoin the Union. In February 1869, Congress approved the 15th Amendment (adopted in 1870), which guaranteed that a citizen’s right to vote would not be denied “on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”

By 1870, all of the former Confederate states had been admitted to the Union, and the state constitutions during the years of Radical Reconstruction were the most progressive in the region’s history. The participation of African Americans in southern public life after 1867 would be by far the most radical development of Reconstruction, which was essentially a large-scale experiment in interracial democracy unlike that of any other society following the abolition of slavery.

Southern Black people won election to southern state governments and even to the U.S. Congress during this period. Among the other achievements of Reconstruction were the South’s first state-funded public school systems, more equitable taxation legislation, laws against racial discrimination in public transport and accommodations and ambitious economic development programs (including aid to railroads and other enterprises). 

Reconstruction Comes to an End  After 1867, an increasing number of southern whites turned to violence in response to the revolutionary changes of Radical Reconstruction. The Ku Klux Klan and other white supremacist organizations targeted local Republican leaders, white and Black, and other African Americans who challenged white authority. Though federal legislation passed during the administration of President Ulysses S. Grant in 1871 took aim at the Klan and others who attempted to interfere with Black suffrage and other political rights, white supremacy gradually reasserted its hold on the South after the early 1870s as support for Reconstruction waned.

Racism was still a potent force in both South and North, and Republicans became more conservative and less egalitarian as the decade continued. In 1874—after an economic depression plunged much of the South into poverty—the Democratic Party won control of the House of Representatives for the first time since the Civil War.

When Democrats waged a campaign of violence to take control of Mississippi in 1875, Grant refused to send federal troops, marking the end of federal support for Reconstruction-era state governments in the South. By 1876, only Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina were still in Republican hands. In the contested presidential election that year, Republican candidate Rutherford B. Hayes reached a compromise with Democrats in Congress: In exchange for certification of his election, he acknowledged Democratic control of the entire South.

The Compromise of 1876 marked the end of Reconstruction as a distinct period, but the struggle to deal with the revolution ushered in by slavery’s eradication would continue in the South and elsewhere long after that date. 

National Woman Suffrage Association In 1869, a new group called the National Woman Suffrage Association was founded by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony. They began to fight for a universal-suffrage amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  Others argued that it was unfair to endanger Black enfranchisement by tying it to the markedly less popular campaign for female suffrage. This pro-15th-Amendment faction formed a group called the American Woman Suffrage Association and fought for the franchise on a state-by-state basis. 

Jim Crow Laws & Racism To marginalize Black people, keep them separate from white people and erase the progress they’d made during Reconstruction, “Jim Crow” laws were established in the South beginning in the late 19th century. Black people couldn’t use the same public facilities as white people, live in many of the same towns or go to the same schools. Interracial marriage was illegal, and most Black people couldn’t vote because they were unable to pass voter literacy tests. 

Jim Crow laws weren’t adopted in northern states; however, Black people still experienced discrimination at their jobs or when they tried to buy a house or get an education. To make matters worse, laws were passed in some states to limit voting rights for Black Americans. 

Moreover, southern segregation gained ground in 1896 when the U.S. Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that facilities for Black and white people could be “separate but equal.  

History of antisemitism in the United States   During the first half of the 20th century, Jews were discriminated or limited in some employment, certain properties, social clubs, resort areas and quotas on enrollment at colleges. Antisemitism reached its peak during the interwar period with the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s, antisemitic publications in The Dearborn Independent, and incendiary radio speeches by Father Coughlin in the late 1930s.

Following World War II and the Holocaust, anti-Jewish sentiment significantly declined in the United States. However, in recent years there has been an upsurge in antisemitic hate crimes.    

Eugenics But the concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race didn’t originate with Hitler. The idea was created in the United States, and cultivated in California, decades before Hitler came to power. California eugenicists played an important, although little known, role in the American eugenics movement’s campaign for ethnic cleansing.

Eugenics was the racist pseudoscience determined to wipe away all human beings deemed “unfit,” preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in twenty-seven states. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in “colonies,” and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries.  

Women Right to vote in some States Starting in 1910, some states in the West began to extend the vote to women for the first time in almost 20 years. Idaho and Utah had given women the right to vote at the end of the 19th century 

19th Amendment to the Constitution Finally, on August 18, 1920, the 19th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified. And on November 2 of that year, more than 8 million women across the United States voted in elections for the first time. 

Equal Rights Amendment In 1923, the National Woman’s Party proposed an amendment to the Constitution that prohibited all discrimination on the basis of sex. The so-called Equal Rights Amendment has never been ratified. 

Americans hold a Nazi rally in Madison Square Garden February 20, 1939

The SS St. Louis sailed out of Hamburg into the Atlantic Ocean in May 1939 carrying one non-Jewish and 936 (mainly German) Jewish refugees seeking asylum from Nazi persecution just before World War II. On 4 June 1939, having failed to obtain permission to disembark passengers in Cuba, the St. Louis was also refused permission to unload on orders of President Roosevelt as the ship waited in the Caribbean Sea between Florida and Cuba.     

The ship finally returned the ship to Europe, where various countries, including the United Kingdom, Belgium, the Netherlands and France, accepted some refugees. Many were later caught in Nazi roundups of Jews in the occupied countries of Belgium, France and the Netherlands, and some historians have estimated that approximately a quarter of them were killed in death camps during World War II.

World War II and Civil Rights  Prior to World War II, most Black people worked as low-wage farmers, factory workers, domestics or servants. By the early 1940s, war-related work was booming, but most Black Americans weren’t given the better paying jobs. They were also discouraged from joining the military.

After thousands of Black people threatened to march on Washington to demand equal employment rights, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 8802 on June 25, 1941. It opened national defense jobs and other government jobs to all Americans regardless of race, creed, color or national origin. 

Black men and women served heroically in World War II, despite suffering segregation and discrimination during their deployment. The Tuskegee Airmen broke the racial barrier to become the first Black military aviators in the U.S. Army Air Corps and earned more than 150 Distinguished Flying Crosses. Yet many Black veterans met with prejudice and scorn upon returning home. This was a stark contrast to why America had entered the war to begin with—to defend freedom and democracy in the world.   As the Cold War began, President Harry Truman initiated a civil rights agenda, and in 1948 issued Executive Order 9981 to end discrimination in the military. 

The Civil Rights Movement was a struggle for social justice that took place mainly during the 1950s and 1960s for Black Americans to gain equal rights under the law in the United States. The Civil War had officially abolished slavery, but it didn’t end discrimination against Black people—they continued to endure the devastating effects of racism, especially in the South. By the mid-20th century, Black Americans had had more than enough of prejudice and violence against them. They, along with many white Americans, mobilized and began an unprecedented fight for equality that spanned two decades.  

Rosa Parks’ Bus Sit-in & courage incited the MIA to stage a boycott of the Montgomery bus system. The Montgomery Bus Boycott lasted 381 days. On November 14, 1956 the Supreme Court ruled segregated seating was unconstitutional.      

Little Rock Nine In 1954, the civil rights movement gained momentum when the United States Supreme Court made segregation illegal in public schools in the case of Brown v. Board of Education.  On September 3, 1957, nine Black students, known as the Little Rock Nine, arrived at Central High School to begin classes but were instead met by the Arkansas National Guard (on order of Governor Orval Faubus) and a screaming, threatening mob.  Finally, President Dwight D. Eisenhower intervened and ordered federal troops to escort the Little Rock Nine to and from classes at Central High. Still, the students faced continual harassment and prejudice.   .     

Civil Rights Act of 1957   Even though all Americans had gained the right to vote, many southern states made it difficult for Black citizens. They often required prospective voters of color to take literacy tests that were confusing, misleading and nearly impossible to pass.   On September 9, 1957, President Eisenhower signed the Civil Rights Act of 1957 into law, the first major civil rights legislation since Reconstruction. It allowed federal prosecution of anyone who tried to prevent someone from voting. It also created a commission to investigate voter fraud.   .     

Woolworth’s Lunch Counter  Despite making some gains, Black Americans still experienced blatant prejudice in their daily lives. On February 1, 1960, four college students took a stand against segregation in Greensboro, North Carolina when they refused to leave a Woolworth’s lunch counter without being served.

Their efforts spearheaded peaceful sit-ins and demonstrations in dozens of cities and helped launch the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee to encourage all students to get involved in the civil rights movement. It also caught the eye of young college graduate Stokely Carmichael, who joined the SNCC during the Freedom Summer of 1964 to register Black voters in Mississippi. In 1966, Carmichael became the chair of the SNCC, giving his famous speech in which he originated the phrase “Black power.” 

Freedom Riders  On May 4, 1961, 13 “Freedom Riders”—seven Black and six white activists–mounted a Greyhound bus in Washington, D.C., embarking on a bus tour of the American south to protest segregated bus terminals. They were testing the 1960 decision by the Supreme Court in Boynton v. Virginia that declared the segregation of interstate transportation facilities unconstitutional.

Facing violence from both police officers and white protesters, the Freedom Rides drew international attention. On Mother’s Day 1961, the bus reached Anniston, Alabama, where a mob mounted the bus and threw a bomb into it. The Freedom Riders escaped the burning bus, but were badly beaten.  Attorney General Kennedy responded to the riders—and a call from Martin Luther King, Jr.—by sending federal marshals to Montgomery.

On May 24, 1961, a group of Freedom Riders reached Jackson, Mississippi. Though met with hundreds of supporters, the group was arrested for trespassing in a “whites-only” facility and sentenced to 30 days in jail. Attorneys for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) brought the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court, who reversed the convictions. Hundreds of new Freedom Riders were drawn to the cause, and the rides continued.

In the fall of 1961, under pressure from the Kennedy administration, the Interstate Commerce Commission issued regulations prohibiting segregation in interstate transit terminals.    

March on Washington  Arguably one of the most famous events of the civil rights movement took place on August 28, 1963: the March on Washington. It was organized and attended by civil rights leaders such as A. Philip Randolph, Bayard Rustin and Martin Luther King, Jr.

More than 200,000 people of all races congregated in Washington, D. C. for the peaceful march with the main purpose of forcing civil rights legislation and establishing job equality for everyone. The highlight of the march was King’s speech in which he continually stated, “I have a dream…”  King’s “I Have a Dream” speech galvanized the national civil rights movement and became a slogan for equality and freedom. 

Civil Rights Act of 1964  President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964—legislation initiated by President John F. Kennedy before his assassination—into law on July 2 of that year.  King and other civil rights activists witnessed the signing. The law guaranteed equal employment for all, limited the use of voter literacy tests and allowed federal authorities to ensure public facilities were integrated. 

@Bloody Sunday  On March 7, 1965, the civil rights movement in Alabama took an especially violent turn as 600 peaceful demonstrators participated in the Selma to Montgomery march to protest the killing of Black civil rights activist Jimmie Lee Jackson by a white police officer and to encourage legislation to enforce the 15th amendment.

As the protesters neared the Edmund Pettus Bridge, they were blocked by Alabama state and local police sent by Alabama governor George C. Wallace, a vocal opponent of desegregation. Refusing to stand down, protesters moved forward and were viciously beaten and teargassed by police and dozens of protesters were hospitalized.  The entire incident was televised and became known as “Bloody Sunday.” Some activists wanted to retaliate with violence, but King pushed for nonviolent protests and eventually gained federal protection for another march.  

Voting Rights Act of 1965  When President Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law on August 6, 1965, he took the Civil Rights Act of 1964 several steps further. The new law banned all voter literacy tests and provided federal examiners in certain voting jurisdictions.  It also allowed the attorney general to contest state and local poll taxes. As a result, poll taxes were later declared unconstitutional in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections in 1966. 

Civil Rights Leaders Assassinated   The civil rights movement had tragic consequences for two of its leaders in the late 1960s. On February 21, 1965, former Nation of Islam leader and Organization of Afro-American Unity founder Malcolm X was assassinated at a rally.

On April 4, 1968, civil rights leader and Nobel Peace Prize recipient Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated on his hotel room’s balcony. Emotionally-charged looting and riots followed, putting even more pressure on the Johnson administration to push through additional civil rights laws.  

@Fair Housing Act of 1968  The Fair Housing Act became law on April 11, 1968, just days after King’s assassination. It prevented housing discrimination based on race, sex, national origin and religion. It was also the last legislation enacted during the civil rights era.  

Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and Section 4(b), which contains the coverage formula that determines which jurisdictions are subjected to preclearance based on their histories of discrimination in voting.

On June 25, 2013, the Court ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that Section 4(b) is unconstitutional because the coverage formula is based on data over 40 years old, making it no longer responsive to current needs and therefore an impermissible burden on the constitutional principles of federalism and equal sovereignty of the states. The Court did not strike down Section 5, but without Section 4(b), no jurisdiction will be subject to Section 5 preclearance unless Congress enacts a new coverage formula. Some allege the ruling has made it easier for state officials to make it harder for ethnic minority voters to vote. 

In 2013 the supreme court gutted voting rights – how has it changed the US?   It’s hard to overstate the significance of this decision. The power of the Voting Rights Act was in the design that the supreme court gutted – discriminatory voting policies could be blocked before they harmed voters. The law placed the burden of proof on government officials to prove why the changes they were seeking were not discriminatory. Now, voters who are discriminated against now bear the burden of proving they are disenfranchised.

The supreme court’s decision didn’t get rid of the Voting Rights Act entirely. Congress could restore the full power of the law by coming up with a new formula to determine which places need to submit their voting changes for pre-clearance. But since 2013, that hasn’t happened. House Democrats passed a new formula late last year2019, but Republicans in the senate have refused to take the measure up.  Here are some ways voting rights have been stripped since 2013:   Polling place closures, Voter ID laws, Proof of citizenship,  

Poll Closures Southern U.S. states have closed 1,200 polling places in recent years: rights group  

2016 Election of Donald Trump

2001 Capital Insurrection

Trump’s 2nd Impeachment

More than 100 bills that would restrict voting are moving through state legislatures 

The Supreme Court Could Demolish Another Pillar of the Voting Rights Act  In early March, the justices will hear oral arguments in a dispute over Arizona’s election laws. At issue is the scope of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, one of the two central pillars of the landmark 1965 statute.   

,

Issues Index (www.kerr2020.com)

from Creating Better World

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Not all conspiracy theories are crazy” Conspiracy Theories and 9-11

2021-02-04 MEK message concerning conspiracy Theory and 9-11

Note:  The point of my long-winded post below is that “Not all conspiracy theories are crazy”  “ Every attempt to expose government and corporate corruption is actually a conspiracy theory.”   “Don’t allow Media and Government to paint a broad brush that all conspiracies are crazy & fact free”   “Their purpose is to cover-up their crimes with the public and bash the truth seekers”  “ I can’t accept the smears against the 9/11 Truth movement – www.911Reward.org”  “ What does QAnon and the 9/11 government story have in common?  There are NO facts to support either “Conspiracy Theory”!

Marjorie Taylor Greene clearly believes in various conspiracy theory without knowledge of any facts to support those beliefs. 

The Corporate media, even alternative media and government officials are  repeatedly and deliberately using the term conspiracy theory to mean something crazy and that  those who support any conspiracy theory are also plain crazy. 

A conspiracy theory is not automatically crazy or true.  It depends on the weight of evidence to support any given conspiracy theory. By definition, a conspiracy theory is “a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event.”  By definition, a conspiracy is “a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.”

One should judge a conspiracy theory by the quantity and quality of information that supports it.  Thus, someone that believes in a specific conspiracy theory should provide some information and facts to support their theory.  In return no one should have the right to dismiss a conspiracy theory without considering that information and facts as presented.  Then you can honestly judge the conspiracy theory as to either it is “totally false, possible or it seems to be true”.

Rep Greene is clearly unable to back any of her conspiracy theories with any facts.  It is fair that she and her views should be held in disregard,  since she has no facts or information to support her position. However, at least, in one case she stated a conspiracy theory, which she clearly never bothered to do any research where information and facts are abundant to support her specific position .  Unless you do the research, you cannot judge a conspiracy theory honestly!

 Included in the article below by PolitiFact among many other of Greene’s “conspiracy theories”  is Greene’s position “that no plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11”. 

That is in major contradiction to the government’s conspiracy theory that “19 terrorists hijacked 4 airlines and crashed them into the twin towers, the Pentagon and Shanksville, PA.”  Clearly, like all her conspiracy theories, Greene never did any real research on the 9/11 attacks.      But does her neglect make the government’s  “conspiracy theory on 9/11” true?  Are there really any facts to back the government’s “conspiracy theory”?   Are there facts to back a contrary conspiracy theory?

PolitiFact, in the article below, offers the following statement with 3 links to prove the government’s 9/11 “conspiracy theory” in their minds.  “American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m., killing all 64 people on board and 125 inside the building. There is visual evidence of the plane hitting the Pentagon, as well as the aftermath.” 

Go toward the end of the PolitiFact article and you will find the above statement and those 3 links provided. There is  absolutely no evidence to support the government conspiracy theory in that information, but they know most people will not look further. 

However, in one of their photos of the Pentagon, it clearly shows evidence of a demolition rather than a plane crash.  Only a demolition can leave a perfectly straight shear wall as part of the damage.  Further, there are no pictures of the crashed plane or bodies.  None of the dozens of security cameras from the Pentagon or nearby businesses have been released or shown, even though they were quickly confiscated by FBI shortly after the attack. They would have provided some necessary facts as to whether a plane actually hit the Pentagon. No known witnesses actually saw any plane crash into the Pentagon.  The 100+ people that claim to have seen the crash  were all in their cars.  They saw a plane and the explosion.  They then presumed the seemly obvious conclusion.  Unfortunately, there was no view of the Pentagon area where the explosion happened from the freeway. However over 10 witnesses, including several police officers, on the ground were able to verify the direction of the plane and all agreed that the plane came in from a different direction than the government’s story!   That flight direction would have made it impossible for the plane to have caused the known damaged area to the Pentagon. Clearly the plane that everyone saw had to have flown over the Pentagon, because there was no other damage to the Pentagon that occurred.  [Note: Barbara Honegger explains how the plane (drone) was destroyed just before it hit Pentagon near heliport. It explains the testimony of the two heliport workers, the plane debris nearby, the fire engine on fire, the blacken Pentagon walls, The explosion in the only video frames released by government is actually the plane being destroyed not the crash of the airliner into the Pentagon which is a total fabrication. MEK]

PolitiFact does mention the 9/11 Commission Report.  However, PolitiFact does not mention that the Commission chose to ignore most all the questions and known facts submitted to them by victim’s surviving family members.  These families had spent over a year fighting the government to just even have an investigation in the first place.  For example, the Commission report refused to explain the collapse of the towers and never even mentioned WTC7, a 47-story building that collapsed in a perfect demolition later that day on 9/11.   You might think that that a detailed explanation was warranted, especially important, as NO steel frame buildings had ever collapsed before in a 100+ years outside of planned demolitions. Yet 3 relatively new high rise steel frame buildings collapsed on that same day, 9-11-2001.  Over 1000 engineers and architects have put their careers and reputations on the line demanding a new independent investigation of 9/11 because it was impossible for the WTC1, 2 and 7 to have collapsed other than by demolition.  A 3 year highly detailed study of WT7 collapse by university engineers proved that the building did not collapse because of fire but from demolition.  You probably never heard the media tell you any of this information.

You can choose to believe the government conspiracy theory on 9/11 or you can look at the known facts which ALL support the conspiracy theory that “9/11 was an inside job”.    The 9/11 attacks were clearly a false flag operation that allowed the Patriot Act, the many unilateral wars of aggression by the U.S. and the contrived “war on terrorism” that has dominated America and the World since.

Since 2005, after the release of the fairytale “9/11 Commission Report”, I have offered $100K (backed by my home equity) to the first person who can demonstrate that the government DID NOT plan, implement and cover-up the 9/11 inside job!  Go to http://www.   911Reward. org to learn more about my offer and learn more facts about 9/11 attacks.  I am still waiting for that first challenge!  Any challenge will be made public for all to see!  

Not all conspiracies theories are false!  People on the left should definitely know that!   Most all of our complaints and investigations about government and corporation misdeeds are in themselves all conspiracy theories which organizations and individuals have diligently researched in an effort to expose them to the public’s attention and right the wrongs.   The struggle over 9/11 truth is just another such battle!

Please do not let the corporate media, some well-intentioned left media and government officials lump all conspiracy theories into “one and same” crazy ideas by crazy ignorant people.  The term “conspiracy theory” is a benign noun.  It does not by itself represent anything true or false!  Please do not continue to be brainwashed by the negative use of “conspiracy theory” or the continuous massive smear attempts against the 9/11 Truth movement.  America and the World have been in a bad way since the “really big Lie”!

What does QAnon and 9/11 government story have in common?  There are NO facts to support either “conspiracy Theory”!

What Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has said about election fraud, QAnon and other conspiracy theories

.

9/11 Truth Archives

911Reward

9/11 – Act of Treason

.

From Creating Better World

Posted in 911Truth Archive, conspiracy theory | Tagged , | Leave a comment

2021-02-05 MEK Challenge to PolitiFact over their support of the “greatest lie of all time!”

Statement

“American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m., killing all 64 people on board and 125 inside the building. There is visual evidence of the plane hitting the Pentagon, as well as the aftermath.”

Who Said It

PolitiFact

When

February 2, 2021

Where

PolitiFact Article: What Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has said about election fraud, QAnon and other conspiracy theories

Comments

PolitiFact, you need to fact check yourself concerning 9/11 attacks.   You are spreading the “greatest lie of all time!”

PolitiFact, in your article, you offer the above statement with 3 links to prove the government’s 9/11 “conspiracy theory”.

However, in one of your photos of the Pentagon, it clearly shows evidence of a demolition rather than a plane crash.  Only a demolition can leave standing a perfectly straight shear wall as part of the damage.  Further, there are no pictures of the crashed plane or bodies.  Professional Pilots have stated the flight path of the plane into the Pentagon would have been near impossible for even the most highly trained pilot let alone a pilot who never flew an airliner before! None of the dozens of security cameras videos from the Pentagon or nearby businesses have been released or shown, even though they were quickly confiscated by FBI shortly after the attack. They would have provided some necessary facts as to whether a plane actually hit the Pentagon. No known witnesses actually saw any plane crash into the Pentagon.  The 100+ people that claim to have seen the crash were all in their cars.  They saw a plane and the explosion.  They then presumed the seemly obvious conclusion.  Unfortunately, there was no view of the Pentagon area where the explosion happened from the freeway. However over 10 witnesses, including several police officers, on the ground were able to verify the direction of the plane and all agreed that the plane came in from a different direction than the government’s story!   That flight direction would have made it impossible for the plane to have caused the known damaged area to the Pentagon. Clearly the plane that everyone saw had to have flown over the Pentagon, because there was no other damage to the Pentagon that occurred. 

PolitiFact you do mention the 9/11 Commission Report as your authority.  However, PolitiFact, you must realize  that the Commission chose to ignore most all the questions and known facts submitted to them by 9/11 victim’s surviving family members.  These families had spent over a year fighting the government to just even have an investigation in the first place.  For example, the Commission report refused to explain the collapse of the towers and never even mentioned WTC7, a 47-story building that collapsed in a perfect demolition later that day on 9/11.   You might think that that a detailed explanation was warranted, especially important, as NO steel frame buildings had ever collapsed before in a 100+ years outside of planned demolitions. Yet 3 relatively new high rise steel frame buildings collapsed on that same day, 9-11-2001.  Over 1000 engineers and architects have put their careers and reputations on the line demanding a new independent investigation of 9/11 because it was impossible for the WTC1, 2 and 7 to have collapsed other than by demolition.  A 3 year highly detailed study of WT7 collapse by university engineers proved that the building did not collapse because of fire but from demolition.  You probably never heard the media tell you any of this information.

Sources: 

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth       

3000+ Profesionals Demand  New Independent 9/11 Investigation           /

Pentagon Witness Interviews on Pentagon Plane Flyover  

Pilots for 9/11 Truth          

Facts mainstream media hide from Public about 9/11     

40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story       /

Complete 911 Timeline    

The 9/11 Commission Report — Omissions and Distortions           Book by David Ray Griffin

Another Nineteen -Legitimate 9/11 Suspects     Book by Kevin Robert Ryan

Debunking 9/11 Debunking      Book by David Ray Griffin

9/11 Press for Truth             Video about 9/11 Families forcing  a Government Investigation to find  9/11 truth

Corporate Theater Banned Movie              

911Reward      

Your Name

Michael E. Kerr

E-Mail

.

9/11 Truth Archives

911Reward

9/11 – Act of Treason

.

from Creating Better World

Posted in 911Truth Archive, conspiracy theory | Tagged , , | Leave a comment