2022-06-26 Help Public Citizen Demand President Biden use full force of his office to protect access to Reproductive Health Care

By now, you know that the United States Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade.

Abortion instantly became, or will likely soon become, illegal or *severely* restricted in 24 states — nearly half the country!

Senator Elizabeth Warren and others in Congress are urging President Joe Biden to do everything in his power to protect access to reproductive health services.

President Biden could take these steps (among others):

  • Provide federal support — such as travel vouchers and child care — to those who must now travel outside of their home state for abortion care.
  • Use federal property and resources to provide reproductive health services in states where abortion is or becomes illegal.
  • Consider giving federal employees ample paid time off to access abortion care and reimbursement for related expenses.
  • Direct federal agencies to make information about medication abortion more accessible and increase access to the treatment.

The Supreme Court’s ruling has triggered a denial of health care to women and pregnant people across the nation. President Biden must do everything in his power to mitigate this damage and to protect access to abortion care.

Join Public Citizen and Elizabeth Warren in a message to President Biden:

Please use the full force of your office to protect access to reproductive health care. This includes, but is not limited to: providing federal support to those now forced to travel out of state for abortion care; using federal property to provide reproductive health services in states where abortion is or becomes illegal; giving federal employees paid time off and reimbursing their expenses for abortion care; and increasing access to medication abortion.

Add your name now.

Thank you for taking action.

For progress,

– Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen

.

Alternative Media on Abortion

Reproductive Rights

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in abortion, reproductive rights, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Abortion – Alternative Media

Note: Click on link for that publication’s articles relating to abortion issue

.

Activist Post     no search available

Against the Current  

Alternet  

American Prospect   

Black Agenda Report

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Common Dreams

Consortium News

Corbett Report 

Counter Currents search on website

Counter Punch

Crooks and Liars

Covert Action   not much

Daily Kos   complicated search onsite

Defense Monitor not much

Democratic Underground 

Democracy Now  

Dissent

Dollars and Sense not much

E Environmental Magazine not much

Electronic Intifada not much

Extra!   not much

Foreign Policy

Foreign Policy In Focus  

Freedom Socialist Newspaper  Password Protected

Global Research

Gray Zone     

Hightower Lowdown

In These Times search onsite

Information Clearing House no search available  

Intelligent Optimist (ODE) archive only since 2013, no search available

Intercept  no search

International Socialist Review archive only since 2019, no search onsite

Intrepid Report 

Jacobin Magazine

Jimmy Dore Show

KPFA

Left Voice archive only since 2012

Loud & Clear  

Making Contact

Middle East Report search on site, not much

Mint Press  

Mother Jones

Multinational Monitor

NACLA Report on the Americas

Nation

New Internationalist

New Republic 

Nuclear Resister not much

Park Center for Independent Media (PCIM)

Peace in Our Times no search, not much

People’s Dispatch

PA -Political Affairs 

Poor Magazine    search onsite, not much

Popular Resistance

Population Connection

Portside

Progressive

Progressive Populist

Project Censored

Quaker Action

Raw Story

Reader Supported News

Real News

Reason

Roots Action

Russell Brand

Russia Today

Salon

Shadow Proof

Sludge no search

Socialist Action

Socialist Viewpoint search online

Sojourners Magazine

Talking Points Memo no search  

Terrain not much

The Cradle not much

Think Progress no search, not much, last posts in 2019

Tom Dispatch

Truth Dig archived since 2020

Truthout

Utne

Washington Monthly

Washington Report 

World Press Review 

Yes Magazine

Young Turks no search, need paid membership

.

Reproductive Rights

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in abortion, Roe vs. Wade, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Sign the petition: President Biden CAN AND MUST use all his power to ensure access to abortion by declaring a public health and national emergency around abortion.

Sign the petition: President Biden CAN AND MUST use all his power to ensure access to abortion by declaring a public health and national emergency around abortion.

Dear MoveOn members,

Just a few hours ago, news broke that the GOP-packed Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. This devastating news means that in the coming days, at least 26 states will ban abortion, and many others will further restrict access to abortion.1

If you are outraged and heartbroken, you are not alone. Together, we can mourn, and then, when we’re ready, turn our grief and rage into fuel for the fight ahead. Millions of people across the country will feel the effects of this decision. Many will feel it today. 

Right now is a time that calls for bold action. And President Biden can step up to protect abortion, too—starting by declaring a public health and national emergency around abortion and by hiring federal abortion providers and dispatching them across the country.2 All of us must come together now, in solidarity with everyone who seeks abortions, especially our siblings in the 26 states that will ban and further restrict their bodily autonomy and access to abortion.

Will you rise in solidarity and sign the petition demanding that President Biden use the power he has to ensure access to abortion?

This will impact so many of us. This will harm and criminalize people who get abortions: women, trans people, and nonbinary people. And it will disproportionately impact Black people, Indigenous people, brown people, poor people, immigrants, disabled people, and young people who have historically been marginalized and faced with structural barriers, even when abortion was legal. That’s why, as a community, we have to stick together as we continue to fight for bodily autonomy and universal health care for all.

There is absolutely no time to waste. President Biden can and must act now.

Add your name to tell President Biden: Declare a public health and national emergency around abortion, and hire federal abortion providers to guarantee abortion access!

Sign the petition now

And overturning Roe v. Wade is just the tip of the iceberg. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (whose wife played an active role in the January 6 insurrection), wrote a concurring opinion that Obergefell, Griswold, and Lawrence should be revisited, too. These are the rulings that protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and marriage equality for the LGBTQ+ community.3 It is so scary.

Republicans, who have won the presidential popular vote only once in the last 34 years, have engaged in a concerted effort to pack the Supreme Court with right-wing extremist judges, who have stripped us of our rights over and over again. In just the last few weeks, these extremist judges have ruled: that states are required to fund private religious schools; to strike down a gun violence prevention law in New York; that if police fail to inform us of our Miranda rights, we can’t sue them; and that border patrol agents can enter any home within 100 miles of the border with no consequences.4,5,6,7

And it’s not just the Supreme Court. The GOP’s latest all-out attacks, from reproductive freedom, to bans on trans athletes, to bans on abortion at fertilization, to bans on gender-affirming care, are all about bodily autonomy–and are fundamentally connected. And Republicans have no intention of slowing down these attacks, so we have to lean into collectivism and fight back together. 

Sign the petition and tell President Biden to declare a public health and national emergency around abortion, and hire federal abortion providers to guarantee abortion access!

There are so many ways to take action right now. And in addition to donating to organizations doing reproductive justice work on the ground, attending protests, volunteering for and voting for progressive Democrats up and down the ballot in local and national elections, we can demand that President Biden use all of his power by declaring a public health and national emergency around abortion and hiring federal abortion providers and dispatching them across the country.

Now is the time to make sure that our elected officials receive our message loud and clear: We won’t go back.

Click here to add your name to this urgent petition, and then pass it along to all of your loved ones to spread the word as far as possible.

Thanks for all you do. 

–Jensine, Nakia, Jaira, Isbah, and the rest of the team

Sources:

1. “Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, ending 50 years of federal abortion rights,” CNBC, June 24, 2022
https://act.moveon.org/go/163829?t=20&akid=326442%2E40854751%2E5VE55Y

2. “What Can Democrats Do to Fight Texas’s Abortion Ban? Lots.” The Nation, September 2, 2021
https://act.moveon.org/go/161937?t=22&akid=326442%2E40854751%2E5VE55Y

3. “Thomas wants the Supreme Court to overturn landmark rulings that legalized contraception, same-sex marriage,” NBC News, June 24, 2022
https://act.moveon.org/go/163991?t=24&akid=326442%2E40854751%2E5VE55Y

4. “The Supreme Court Just Fused Church and State — and It Has Even Uglier Plans Ahead,” Rolling Stone, June 22, 2022
https://act.moveon.org/go/163987?t=26&akid=326442%2E40854751%2E5VE55Y

5. “Supreme Court strikes down New York gun law restricting concealed carry in major Second Amendment case,” CNBC, June 23, 2022
https://act.moveon.org/go/163988?t=28&akid=326442%2E40854751%2E5VE55Y

6. “The Supreme Court Strips Us of Miranda Warnings,” The Nation, June 23, 2022
https://act.moveon.org/go/163989?t=30&akid=326442%2E40854751%2E5VE55Y

7. “U.S. Supreme Court insulates federal agents from accountability,” Reuters, June 10, 2022
https://act.moveon.org/go/163990?t=32&akid=326442%2E40854751%2E5VE55Y

.

Alternative Media on Abortion

Reproductive Rights

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in abortion, Roe vs. Wade, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

2022-06-24 Reclaim the Net News

logo
Reclaim The Net accepts no advertising and is funded entirely by the community. If you support free speech, the eradication of cancel culture, and restoring privacy and civil liberties, please become a supporter here. Thank you. SUPPORTERS1How the US government uses data brokers to spy on citizens
Location data that users of mobile devices willingly surrender to a plethora of apps that request it is ending up in some places that a majority of those users are fully unaware of.

And yet their every move can be retraced or monitored in this way, revealing their activities, inclinations, and personalities: where they live, work, what religious sites they visit, and which protests they take part in.

But rather than being confined to the apps themselves to enable their functionality – which is how the need to harvest location data is explained in the first place – this information is sold and shared, changing hands from app developers to data brokers to advertisers, and lately more and more often with US law enforcement, including the military, and spy agencies.

Become a supporter here.

Get the post here.

MASSIVE GROWTH1Brave Search announces record growth, new featuresPrivacy-friendly Brave browser’s search engine has announced that a year after development started, it is exiting the beta phase and introducing a new tool that allows users to “de-Google” their search results.

The “Googled” results are carefully curated by Google, and almost every other search engine, which these days give prominence to ads over information, and then further algorithmically promote or downrank sites based on a variety of criteria, some of them highly controversial.

Brave looks to fix this problem by allowing users to curate their own search results, instead of allowing the Big Tech behemoth and others to do it for them.

Brave calls the new feature “Goggles” and says that its goal is to put users in charge. According to Brave Chief of Search Josep M. Pujol, cited in a blog post on the company’s site, using Goggles is a way to “open” search ranking and filtering.
1Goggles allows anyone to create rules and filters that “constrain the searchable space” and can also be used to change the ordering of results.
“Anyone could then choose to apply a Goggle – or extend it – to their view of Brave Search results. Essentially, Goggles will act as a re-ranking option on top of the Brave Search index,” Brave announced.

Providing the opportunity to create multiple rankings instead of a single one is the point of the exercise here, doing away with bias – including that of political nature – that is present in Google, and also in Microsoft’s Bing, etc.
One example shown in the post is creating a Goggle that will return results only from bloggers; and the same can be done to filter results coming from any site or media, as well as covering any specific topic.

Goggles is still in its beta testing phase, and is used in Brave Search (included in the Brave browser, and accessible in others via search.brave.com) and then clicking the Goggles tab in the search results page.

The code for this feature is available on GitHub (Goggles themselves must be hosted on GitHub or GitLab), and Brave says that any users can write their own or use Goggles created by others. Several examples are included as demos, showing the feature’s functionality and explaining how Goggles are created.

Brave Search launched in June 2021. It started with 8.1 million searches and had 411.7 million searches in May 2022, a 5,000% growth.
1The company believes the search engine has been more talked about than DuckDuckGo because of the popularity of its browser. Brave Search users receive 92% of their searches directly from Brave’s search index, not Google and Bing indexes. DuckDuckGo controversially uses Bing.

“Search engines that depend too much or exclusively on Big Tech are subject to censorship, biases, and editorial decisions,” explains Brave in the blog post.

“Brave Search is committed to openness in search. It does not manipulate its algorithm to bias, filter, or down-rank results (unless it’s compelled by law to do so).”

The company has also introduced some features to customize searches. For instance, it introduced Discussions in April. The feature compiles results from forums.
Reclaim The Net accepts no advertising and is funded entirely by the community. If you support free speech, the eradication of cancel culture and restoring privacy and civil liberties, please become a supporter here.MORE CENSORSHIP DEMANDS2New York Times complains that Big Tech may censor less “election misinformation” during the 2022 midtermsThe New York Times isn’t happy that Meta and Twitter may be scaling back their censorship of “election misinformation” during the 2022 US midterm elections.

Before the 2020 US presidential election, Big Tech platforms deployed unprecedented levels of censorship by censoring then-President Donald Trump numerous times, banning popular pro-Trump groups, and more. Post-election, this mass censorship continued with President Trump being permanently banned by all the major tech platforms, discussions of “widespread fraud or errors” changing the 2020 US presidential election outcome being banned, free speech platform Parler (which many users had flocked to in an attempt to escape Big Tech’s censorship) being deplatformed by the tech giants, and more.

The mainstream media and Big Tech used the vague, subjective term “election misinformation” to justify this silencing of a sitting US President and the mass censorship of election-related speech.

But according to The New York Times, Meta’s election team, which censors election misinformation and had more than 300 people in 2020, has now been slashed to around 60 people. Additionally, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg met with the team regularly in 2020 but now the team meets with Meta’s President of Global Affairs, Nick Clegg instead of Zuckerberg.

Twitter employees also told The Times that the pending sale of the company to Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has resulted in it pulling back some of its focus on elections.

And civil rights groups complained to The New York Times that Zuckerberg no longer discusses efforts to thwart election misinformation with them like he did in 2020.

“I’m concerned,” President of the NAACP Derrick Johnson told The Times. “It appears to be out of sight, out of mind.”

In its article, The New York Times claims that this potential reduction in censorship at Meta “could have far-reaching consequences as faith in the U.S. electoral system reaches a brittle point” and laments that dozens of political candidates who are running for election in 2022 and believe that President Trump was robbed of the 2020 election are reaching American voters through social media platforms.

The Times also takes issue with the viral Dinesh D’Souza documentary “2000 Mules” reportedly getting more than 430,000 interactions Facebook and Instagram. These 430,000 interactions represent a fraction of the total views and interactions 2000 Mules has received on the alternative free speech platforms Rumble and Locals which hosted and provided censorship protection to the documentary. However, The Times points to these interactions as an example of election misinformation being “rampant online.”

While The New York Times fears that users and political candidates could be allowed to speak more freely about elections on Big Tech platforms in the run-up to the 2022 midterms, Meta has responded by insisting that there will still be lots of censorship.

Meta spokesman Tom Reynolds disputed The Times’ assertion that 60 people focused on election integrity and said hundreds of people across more than 40 teams focus on election work. He added that with each election, Meta is “building teams and technologies and developing partnerships to take down manipulation campaigns, limit the spread of misinformation and maintain industry-leading transparency around political ads and pages.”

Twitter spokesman Trenton Kennedy also insisted that the company was continuing its efforts to “protect the integrity of election conversation” and noted that Twitter has labeled the accounts of political candidates for the midterms.
BRAZIL IS CHALLENGING FREE SPEECH3Twitter complies with order to ban Brazil’s Workers’ Cause PartyTwitter on Wednesday blocked the account of Brazil’s PCO (“Workers’ Cause Party”), implementing the decision of the country’s Supreme Federal Court (TSE) Justice Alexandre de Moraes issued earlier this June.

The same order to censor PCO has been given to Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, Telegram, and YouTube. Thus far, only Twitter and TikTok complied, according to the Brazilian press.

The party has been accused of taking part in spreading “fake news,” but PCO leader Rui Costa Pimenta rejected this, and accused the current authorities of behaving worse than military dictatorships have done in the past in this South American country.

Some of the posts that earned the party the ire of the Supreme Court referred to Moraes as having fervor for dictatorship, being “a skinhead in a toga,” and, “a fascist toucan.” In addition, PCO called for the Court to be dissolved and accused the Superior Electoral Court of preparing to rig the general election in case former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva wins. Brazilians will head to the polls this October.

Moraes, meanwhile, is in charge of the Court’s battle against “fake news” and reporting about entities that allegedly engage in the practice, and these reports have so far mostly targeted allies of President Jair Bolsonaro’s government. Moraes is a fierce critic of Bolsonaro and is considered his political rival.

But after being called “a skinhead in a toga” and “a fascist toucan,” the jurist wrote in his order that he saw indications PCO was spreading “criminal statements” using the party infrastructure, as well as being behind “widespread repeated attacks on democratic institutions.”

According to Pimenta, who was posting on Twitter from his own account, censorship used to be applied to individual news articles, but these days access to entire media sites is being blocked.

He also warned that freedom of speech in Brazil is increasingly under attack. It is unclear if PCO’s Twitter account is blocked only in Brazil or globally.
Reports out of this country say that TikTok, although accepting the decision made by Moraes, sent a protest note to the Supreme Court, arguing that it PCO is a legal political party and that blocking it “severely violates constitutional guarantees of freedom of expression and access to information.”
IRONIC4Even Meta pushes back against the UK’s online surveillance and censorship billIn a submission published Wednesday, Facebook, and WhatsApp owner Meta warned that the UK Online Safety Bill “risks people’s private messages being constantly surveilled and censored.”

Meta noted that the draft bill proposes that social media companies and search engines should shield users from “legal but harmful content” on their user-to-user services. The Big Tech company argued that the definition does not differentiate platforms from messaging services, and would mean “scanning all private messaging.”

We obtained a copy of Meta’s statements here.
Meta has already been the target of criticism for its censorship policies and the UK bill would force even more.

A spokesperson for the Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport, in a statement, focused only on the child abuse aspects, ignoring other concerns and said: “Tech firms have failed to tackle child abuse and end-to-end encryption could blind them to it on their sites while hampering efforts to catch the perpetrators. As a last resort, Ofcom has the power to make private messaging apps use technology to identify child sexual abuse material – this can only be used when proportionate and with strict legal privacy safeguards in place.”

Meta’s submission is the latest in a long list of complaints about the draft bill that was first published in March.

Twitter expressed concerns that the bill will hurt freedom of expression. The microblogging platform also noted that the bill’s journalism exemption could be exploited by “bad faith actors.”

Google’s parent company Alphabet warned that the bill promotes “automated general monitoring, and over-removal, of content.”
PRIVACY INVASION5Adelaide considers major facial recognition CCTV systemEven though collection and use of biometric data of citizens including through facial recognition is largely unregulated and has increasingly been raising privacy alarms in Australia, law enforcement in one of its states, South Australia, plans to deploy precisely this technology.

Current privacy laws are viewed by experts as insufficient to properly cover this topic. For this reason, large retailers are among those using facial recognition without even needing to inform those subjected to this type of monitoring.

And the police in Adelaide does not appear to share any of the concerns as it prepares to receive funding for a public 360-degree CCTV camera system with facial and number plate recognition capabilities.

The City Council was last year opposed this, asking the police to delay the project until proper legal safeguards have been put in place.

Now Councilor Phil Martin is the most vocal in pointing out that systems that carry with them such privacy concerns should only be used with clear rules in place.

ABC News is reporting about this, noting that other members of the community are also against the plan, including because identification accuracy based on AI-processed biometrics drops when it comes to persons with darker skin.

However, the police seem determined to go ahead with the scheme regardless.

Martin’s position was cited by a statement issued by Monash University, which will on June 27 organize a public debate on facial recognition that will bring together academics, and government and industry representatives, where the school’s main argument is that the field needs consistent regulation.

Adelaide City Council should vote on the proposal to fund the new surveillance system only a day later. If approved, it will cost city $2.1 million.
Meanwhile, Adelaide Deputy Mayor Arman Abrahimzadeh is quoted as saying that the city is “comfortable” funding CCTV camera system upgrade as something necessary for public safety.

Abrahimzadeh also revealed that Adelaide asked the South Australia Police to provide assurances they will “not turn on” the new system until proper legislation is there to regulate its use.

But it appears no such assurance has yet arrived, or is about to.
“There is no legislative restriction on the use of facial recognition technology in South Australia for investigations,” the the state’s police told ABC News, adding:

“Should a facial recognition capability be available, investigators will consider the seriousness of the matter and evidentiary value when determining if it is appropriate to use the technology.”
FIRST OF ITS KIND6US House subcommittee passes online privacy billA House Energy and Commerce subcommittee has passed a bipartisan bill addressing online privacy. The bill aims at limiting social media companies’ collection of personal data.

The legislation would require tech companies to only collect the personal data that is required to provide their services. Sensitive information like Social Security numbers would also be required to have extra security when being stored and processed.

We obtained a copy of the draft bill for you here.

The subcommittee passed the bill and will now proceed to the full committee for review. The bill was sponsored by Democrat Reps. Jan Schakowsky and Frank Pallone and Republican Reps. Gus Bilirakis and McMorris Rodgers.
“Today’s markup is another milestone towards our ultimate goal of enacting meaningful national privacy legislation,” said Pallone.

Previous efforts to pass online privacy laws have been unsuccessful due to lobbying from tech companies, which insist that the cost of their free services is data collection for advertising.

There is also the issue of whether federal laws would fall short of state laws, which are often stronger. Additionally, there is debate on whether users would be empowered to sue companies for privacy violations.
Reclaim The Net exists because of readers like you. Keep us going and become a supporter.

We appreciate your support.SupportThanks for reading,

Reclaim The Net

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in internet, privacy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Sign the petition to Leader Schumer: Schedule a vote on the Equal Rights Amendment

Sign the petition to Leader Schumer: Schedule a vote on the Equal Rights Amendment

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that guarantees equal legal rights for all American citizens, without regard to sex or gender.

The ERA was passed by Congress with well over the required 2/3 majority vote and sent to the states in 1972. Virginia became the 38th – and last needed – state to meet the three-quarter state ratification requirement in 2020. The ERA has satisfied all requirements to be added to the Constitution as the 28th Amendment.

And still, it has yet to be added to our Constitution. Recognizing the ERA as the 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution would influence the legal tone and decisions regarding gender equal rights, protecting gender equality in discrimination cases brought forth over time. The ERA is needed to constitutionally ensure that the foundations and freedoms of our democracy apply equally to all genders. In just 24 words, it reads: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.”

On March 17, 2021, with bipartisan support, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to pass H.J. Res 17, removing a time limit on the ERA ratification process. Now, it is up to the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Schumer has yet to schedule a vote on SJ Res 1 – the Senate version of the resolution passed in the House.

The arbitrary time limit in the amendment’s introductory clause remains an obstacle standing in the way of recognizing gender equality in the Constitution, and the Senate can vote to remove this obstruction.

Join us in demanding Leader Schumer stop holding up progress and schedule a vote on the resolution. The ERA has met the requirements for becoming the 28th Amendment, now it’s time to officially add it to the Constitution.

Sign the petition to Leader Schumer: Schedule a vote on the Equal Rights Amendment.

.

Participating Organizations:

ERA Coalition Washington, DC

Blue Amp Action

Civic Shout

The Juggernaut Project

The Nation Magazine

OD Action

TakeItBack.Org Sioux Falls, SD

The Six PAC

Progressive Reform Network

Free and Fair Democracy PAC

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in Equal Rights Amendment, ERA | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Public Comments

Please submit your comment or question at the bottom of the Page.

Politically oriented comments especially welcome, but disrespectful comments will be deleted.

You can also leave any issue-oriented comments at an appropriate issue post at Specific Issues Index.

from Creating Better World

Posted in Public Comments | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Richard Clarke

Sources & Organizations

Dig Within

Specific Information

Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror

Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects -Chapter Six

Another Nineteen – Kevin Ryan on the Legitimate 9/11 Suspects

Richard A. Clarke -Wikipedia

2014-02-02 Getting Real About Richard Clarke – DW

.

9/11 Real Suspects

The 9/11 Attack Government Conspiracy

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in 9/11, 911Truth Archive, War on Terror | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Continuity of Government

Sources & Organizations

Want to Know

Specific Information

Continuity of Government – Shadow Government’s Hidden Means of Control – WK

2020-03-21 HE TRUTH ABOUT THE UNITED STATES’ “CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT” PLANS & THE CORONAVIRUS PERFECT STORM Yet, there are key aspects of COG and its development that Arkin leaves out. For instance, in his timeline on how such plans have developed in the post-World War II era, he conveniently fails to mention any of the Reagan administration’s major changes to COG, including the Reagan-era Executive Order on which all current COG programs are based. Indeed, many of the “extra-Constitutional” aspects of COG that Arkin mentions began during the Reagan administration, when these plans were redrafted to largely exclude members of Congress, including the Speaker of the House, from succession plans and even moved to essentially eliminate Congress in the event of COG being implemented, with near total power instead being given to the executive branch and the military. It was also during this time that the “devolution” aspect of COG was hammered out, as it created three president-cabinet “teams” to be stationed in different parts of the country outside of the nation’s capital. Arkin’s decision to not mention how COG was a major focus of the Reagan administration is striking given that that administration poured hundreds of millions of dollars annually into COG planning and development and also conducted COG drills on a regular basis.

.

The 9/11 Attack Government Conspiracy

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in 9/11, 911 Attack, 911Truth Archive, Continuity of Government | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

George Tenet

Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects -Chapter Five

Another Nineteen – Kevin Ryan on the Legitimate 9/11 Suspects

At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA

Dig Within

George Tenet – Wikipedia

George Tenet | Military Wiki | Fandom

Source Watch

.

CIA Director George Tenet Facilitated 9/11 – DW

George John Tenet – SW

.

1997-05-05 The Intelligence Failure In Iraq: What Did George Tenet Know — And When Did He Know It?

.

9/11 Real Suspects

The 9/11 Attack Government Conspiracy

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in 9/11, 911 Attack, 911Truth Archive | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Louis Freeh

Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects -Chapter Four

Another Nineteen – Kevin Ryan on the Legitimate 9/11 Suspects

Louis Freeh – Wikipedia

.

2021-05-20 Who is Louis Freeh? FBI ex-chief gave $100K to Joe Biden trust and sought ‘future work’, reveal Hunter emails

2015-01-02 LOUIS FREEH’S LATEST INVESTIGATION: BILLIONAIRE BUSINESSMAN ACCUSED OF BRIBING AFRICAN GOVERNMENT

2015-09-10 UPDATE: Louis Freeh’s Curious Car Accident

2015-04-15 Officials: Ex-FBI chief Freeh nearly died in Vt. crash

.

9/11 Real Suspects

The 9/11 Attack Government Conspiracy

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Posted in 9/11, 911Truth Archive | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment