Graphene Oxide Nanotechnology

Could this be associated with Covid-19 existence, generation and symptoms as suggested by a Spanish research Team (They admitted that more peer-to-peer research is deemed neccessary). Graphene oxide is the supposed SARS-CoV-2, the supposed new coronvirus provoked before the disease called COVID-19. Therefore, we never had real isolation and purification of a new coronavirus, as recognized by most health institutions at the highest level and in different countries when they were questioned about itCOVID-19 disease is the result of introducing graphene oxide by various routes of administration.

.

Graphene Oxide: The Actual Contents Inside Pfizer Vials Exposed!

Dr Jane Ruby joins Stew Peters to discuss a scientific report (see powerful video) that just came out from the University of Almería School of Engineering in Spain entitled, “Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension: Observational Study in Optical and Electron Microscopy”, where it was found that each dose of the Pfizer shot “was found to contain 6 ng of RNA and 747 ng of graphene oxide, which is 99.103% of the medication.

“Stew, this is going to tie directly to strokes, to the heart attacks – and we’re giving this to pregnant mothers and babies? This is really something everybody’s gotta start paying attention to.” Stew asks her if graphene oxide is a poison and she responds, “It is most definitely a poison.”

Stew replies, “This is horrific. I get chills listening to this. I don’t know why the media’s not picking any of this up. They’re in on it. They want you dead. They’re part of the murder plot…

“Stew, I’m going to go back to the beginning. The PCR test is a fraud perpetrated by Christian Drosten and Olfert Landt. The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated, its protein sequences have never been demonstrated or validated, no one can prove to us that it ever really existed.

“Since the Nuremberg Trials, you cannot experiment on human beings, regardless of the drug, the disease state, you cannot do it without the approval of a Human Subjects Review Board. That’s an independent board that approves your protocol and your informed consent, which no one’s ever seen – a real informed consent about these jabs…

.

Graphene Oxide: a toxic substance in the vial of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Another Article Source

This important interview with Ricardo Delgado MartinFounder and Director of Quinta Columna. Ricardo is responsible for coordinating the Spanish research team’s analysis of the impacts of graphene oxide nano-particles contained in the vial of the mRNA vaccine. Ricardo Delgado Martin is specialized in biostatistics, clinical microbiology, clinical genetics and immunology.

The results of their analysis by electron microscopy and spectroscopy are far-reaching. Graphene oxide is a toxin which triggers thrombi and blood coagulation. It also has an impact on the immune system. Graphene oxide accumulated in the lungs can have devastating impacts.

The results of the Spanish study suggest, yet to be fully confirmed, that the recorded vaccine related deaths and “adverse events” (e.g. published in the US by the CDC and in the EU) are attributable to the presence of graphene oxide nano-particles contained in the Covid vaccine vial. Of significance, (acknowledged by national health authorities) graphene oxide is also contained in the face mask.

Graphene has electromagnetic properties which have been detected in people who have been vaccinated. These effects have been amply documented and confirmed. See the study conducted by the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance

For further details on this project see the report by Prof. Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, specialized in Chemistry and Biology, Escuela Superior de Ingenería, University of Almería. See summary of their report entitled Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension, Observational study in Optical and Electron Microscopy. Full Study (English)

Speaking on behalf of the Spanish research team, Ricardo Delgado Martin recommends that the covid-19 experimental mRNA vaccine should be cancelled and discontinued immediately.

This is a controversial study. There are scientists and medical doctors who disagree with the results of the Spanish study. The evidence has to be ascertained and corroborated. What is required is that independent scientists and health professionals conduct their own lab analysis of the contents of the vaccine vial. Similarly, we call upon the national health authorities of the 193 member states of the UN which are currently vaccinating their people, to conduct their own study and analysis of the vaccine vial. And if graphene-oxide is detected, the vaccination program should immediately be discontinued.

Interview with Ricardo Delgado Martin

.

Graphene-Oxide Based Nanotechnology and Immunology-An Exciting Partnership

As treatments and infection control practices surrounding COVID-19 continue to evolve, nanotechnological solutions are being considered for their unique properties. Graphene is an atomic-thick layer of atoms structured in a two-dimensional fashion. Its derivatives, such as graphene-oxide (GO), contain antimicrobial and antiviral properties due primarily to their electrostatic charge. For example, the strong negative electrostatic charge of GO has an affinity for the positively charged viral surface of COVID-19. This makes GO uniquely suited for functions such as disinfection or decontamination of surfaces. Recently, graphene-based material applications have been proposed not just for COVID-19, but also for other conditions such as cancer. 

.

Effects of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles on the Immune System Biomarkers Produced by RAW 264.7 and Human Whole Blood Cell Cultures

Graphene oxide nanoparticles (GONPs) have attracted a lot of attention due to their many applications. These applications include batteries, super capacitors, drug delivery and biosensing. However, few studies have investigated the effects of these nanoparticles on the immune system. The GONPs were cytotoxic to both RAW and whole blood cell cultures at 500 μg/mL.  The current study shows that GONPs modulate immune system biomarkers and that these may pose a health risk to individuals exposed to this type of nanoparticle.

.

Reuters Fact Check-No evidence graphene oxide is present in available COVID-19 vaccines via lipid nanoparticles

Claims stem from a July 28 talk show where a woman in the video, introduced as Karen Kingston, points to documentation on a lipid particle maker’s website which allegedly shows that graphene oxide is present in their products. Pfizer and Moderna told Reuters, however, that graphene oxide is not among their vaccines’ ingredients.

Verdict: Reuters did not find evidence that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain graphene oxide in their lipid nanoparticles. Pfizer and Moderna have said that no graphene oxide is present in their vaccines.

(Oops. It just so happens that Reuters “Fact Checker” chairman and former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) James C. Smith “is also a top investor and board member of Pfizer”. “No Conflict of Interest”).

[MEK Note: Reuters refers to a single talk show video, ignores reports by real experts, does not do any of their own testing of vaccines, but if Pfizer and Moderna say that no graphene oxide is present in their vaccines then it must be true. When you want to quash the truth that has gotten out of the bag, you find a crazy unsupported conspiracy theory, promote it while using it to paint all criticisms as also crazy conspiracy theories. Bury the truth in a massive corporate smears campaign against any truth and their whistleblowers!]

.

Face Masks Contain Graphene, A Poisonous Substance

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, July 14, 2021

“The wearing of the face mask started in the immediate wake of the covid-19 lockdown on March 11, 2020. Worldwide, people have been instructed to wear the mask for more than a year.

And then one year later, we are told that in some cases it may contain a poisonous substance.

According to Health Canada: “There is a potential that wearers could inhale graphene particles from some masks, which may pose health risks.””

,

Nanotechnology-derived Graphene in Face Masks — Now There Are Safety Concerns

By Andrew Maynard, July 12, 2021

“Given all that we know about the pulmonary toxicity of engineered nanoparticles, and the uncertainty over the inhalation risks of graphene, surely someone should have asked this question when developing graphene-containing masks.

When airborne nanoparticles are inhaled and penetrate to the lower regions of the lungs (the alveolar region), they can elicit a response that’s more closely associated with the number or surface area of the particles than their mass. And because of this, very small quantities of material have the potential to cause a lot of harm — much more than you might imagine from the mass of material alone.”

.

Masks contain deadly graphene oxide nanoparticles indicted Fauci associate Charles Leiber patented as a deadly “gain of function” ingredient that enters the respiratory system and bloodstream

The disposable “Covid” masks politicians are ordering Americans to wear contain a highly-toxic nanoparticle called “graphene oxide.”  The nanoparticle is an agent of “chemical warfare” that was studied by scientists at biosafety level 4 laboratories in the United States and Communist China for its “gain of function” use as a war tool.

Graphene oxide nanoparticles have also been identified in the Covid booster injections; and is being expanded into the global ecosystem through the household and industrial waste stream as well as the feces and urine of injected individuals.  It causes inflammation in hearts and shuts down the lungs.  It also produces cancer causing cells and diabetes.  Once in the waste stream self-healing graphene oxide nanoparticles get into our drinking water.

Federally indicted Harvard professor Dr. Charles Lieber, a Russian American, was funded for 15 years by Italian American Dr. Anthony Fauci in his role as the National Institute of Health’s director.  One of  Lieber’s areas of study was on gain of function research that would end up with weaponized graphene oxide nanoparticles for uses in chemical warfare.

The research went on to explain how the human immune system engages a self-healing process called “apoptosis” that causes it to learn the characteristics of foreign bacterial or viral invaders to kill.  The word apoptosis translates to “programmed cellular death.”  The graphene oxide nanoparticle is one of the hidden ingredients in the “messenger ribonucleic acid” mRNA so called “vaccines.”  Injectible or breathable “carbon nanotube hydrogels” are the “nanocarriers” that deliver graphene oxide nanoparticles  into the bloodstream.  In the case of the masks the nanoparticles are breathed into the respiratory system to enter the blood stream.

Graphene oxide nanoparticles are the efficient chemical weapon that was being studied simultaneously at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Maryland. 

.

Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms. 

One of the most chilling reports by the Fauci-controlled NCBI website uploaded it on March 31, 2016.

Toxicity of GFNs (in vivo and in vitro) GFNs penetrate through the physiological barriers or cellular structures by different exposure ways or administration routes and entry the body or cells, eventually resulting in toxicity in vivo and in vitro. The varying administration routes and entry paths, different tissue distribution and excretion, even the various cell uptake patterns and locations, may determine the degree of the toxicity of GFNs . So to make them clear may be helpful to better understand the laws of the occurrence and development of GFNs toxicity.

The common administration routes in animal models include airway exposure (intranasal insufflation, intratracheal instillation, and inhalation), oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection. The major exposure route for GFNs in the working environment is airway exposure, thus inhalation and intratracheal instillation are used mostly in mice to simulate human exposure to GFNs. 

Generally, GFNs may exert different degrees of toxicity in animals or cell models by following with different administration routes and penetrating through physiological barriers, subsequently being distributed in tissues or located in cells, eventually being excreted out of the bodies.

In this review, we summarize the available information on regulating factors and the mechanisms of GFNs toxicity, and propose some challenges and suggestions for further investigations of GFNs, with the aim of completing the toxicology mechanisms, and providing suggestions to improve the biological safety of GFNs and facilitate their wide application. Keywords: Graphene-family nanomaterials, Toxicity, Toxicokinetics, Mechanisms, Physicochemical properties, Future prospects

.

Study on Electromagnetism of Vaccinated Persons in Luxembourg

For the past few months, hundreds of amateur videos have been popping up all over social media featuring people who have visibly become electromagnetic following vaccination.

After many questions were raised by a number of our members about this “supposed” electromagnetic effect in vaccinated subjects, our association decided to take a concrete interest in this intriguing subject. This survey, of a purely statistical and sociological nature, on this supposed electromagnetic effect, which is the subject of this report, raises at least three important questions:

  1. Is it true that people show an electromagnetic effect after vaccination?
  2. If so, is it true that only vaccinated individuals show this effect?
  3. What is actually injected into individuals under the qualification of vaccine that causes this effect?

Conclusion:

  • It was found that vaccinated individuals do give off an electromagnetic field and that the earlier the individuals were vaccinated, the stronger the field they gave off. This sensation and appraisal, which is purely a tactile experience when the shoulder magnet is applied and removed, should be verified much more accurately with much more precise equipment.
  • It was extremely difficult to find individuals willing to play along with this extremely disorienting experiment.
  • Individuals are interested in the experiment out of curiosity and then when they see that the magnet clings onto their skin, they become dubious at first, then they suddenly become cold. Some of them even become extremely nervous, even completely shocked.
  • People sincerely wonder how a magnet can stick to their skin as easily as it sticks to a metal pole.
  • They ask for an explanation and the investigator reassures them that there must be an explanation. They are referred back to the doctor who advised them to get an injection.
  • One lady even cried and told me that she did not want to be vaccinated but was forced to because her employer said she had to because she works in contact with customers.
  • In the conversations, it emerged that people do not even vaccinate for medical or health reasons, out of conviction or fear of the disease but often in the hope of returning to a normal life and being able to travel freely again.
  • During the exchanges, people clearly express their dismay by saying afterwards that they are taken as hostages. Many acknowledge that this injection is non-consensual and that at no time were they given rational explanations, even if only from the point of view of the benefit-risk balance. After reflection and discussion, they then describe this act as: “mistake, madness, loophole, solution, or even blackmail”.

To the question, is it true that people present an electromagnetic effect after having undergone at least one act of vaccination, the answer is affirmative and yes, indeed, individuals do become electromagnetic on the injection zone at least.

To the question of what is injected into individuals that causes this effect, we reply that it is up to the governments and authorities responsible for the health of Luxembourgers to answer this question, as they are the ones who took the heavy decision to vaccinate the population.

.

COVID-19 Caused by Graphene Oxide: Introduced by Several Ways into the Body

This is a controversial report based on the findings of Spanish researchers. It remains to be fully ascertained. What is required is to have precise details on the composition of the mRNA vaccine, from one or more samples of the drug, also including the identification of the so-called digital microchip. Independent laboratory studies  based on several samples of all four major mRNA “vaccines”, namely AstraZeneka, BioNtech-Pfizer, Moderna Inc, Johnson and Johnson.

Graphene oxide accumulated in the lungs generates bilateral pneumonias by uniform dissemination in the pulmonary alveolar tract. Graphene oxide causes a metallic taste. Perhaps this is starting to make sense to you now. Inhaled graphene oxide causes inflammation of the mucous membranes and thus loss of taste and partial or total loss of smell.

Graphene oxide acquires powerful magnetic properties inside the organism. This is the explanation for the magnetic phenomenon that billions of people around the world have already experienced after various routes of administration of graphene oxide. Among them the vaccine.

In short, graphene oxide is the supposed SARS-CoV-2, the supposed new coronvirus provoked before the disease called COVID-19. Therefore, we never had real isolation and purification of a new coronavirus, as recognized by most health institutions at the highest level and in different countries when they were questioned about it. COVID-19 disease is the result of introducing graphene oxide by various routes of administration.

Graphene oxide is extremely potent and strong in aerosols, as is the alleged SARS-CoV-2. Like any material, graphene oxide has what we call an electronic absorption band‘. This means a certain frequency above which the material is excited and oxidizes very rapidly, thus breaking the equilibrium with the proliferation in the organism of the toxicant against our natural antioxidant glutathione reserves. Precisely this frequency band is emitted in the new emission bandwidths of the new 5G wireless technology. That is why the deployment of these antennas never stopped during the pandemic.

In fact, they were among the few services that were maintained, apart from a special surveillance by the State Security Forces and Corps to these antennas. We suspect in that the 2019 anti-flu campaign graphene oxide was introduced in these vials, since it was already used as an adjuvant.

With subsequent 5G technology trials in different parts of the world, COVID-19 disease developed in interaction of external electromagnetic fields and graphene oxide now in their bodies. Remember that it all started in Wuhan, and this was the first pilot sample city in the world to do the 5G technology trial in late November 2019. It’s a coincidence in space and time.

.

Coronavirus Covid-19 Research History – Index

.

Specific Issues Index

from Creating Better World

Unknown's avatar

About mekorganic

I have been a Peace and Social Justice Advocate most all of my adult life. In 2020 (7.4%) and 2022 (21%), I ran for U.S. Congress in CA under the Green Party. This Blog and website are meant to be a progressive educational site, an alternative to corporate media and the two dominate political parties. Your comments and participation are most appreciated. (Click photo) .............................................. Created and managed by Michael E. Kerr
This entry was posted in coronavirus, Covid-19, Graphene oxide, pandemic, vaccinations and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment