What Are Controlled Demolitions?

Posted on September 19, 2020 by mekorganic
What Are Controlled Demolitions?


Controlled demolitions are demolitions of structures engineered to achieve certain objectives.

Demands of safety and economy are paramount in commercial demolitions, whose objectives include:

Avoiding damage to surrounding structures

Minimizing production of dust and other disturbances

Facilitating debris removal

Usually those demands are best met by bringing a building down into its own footprint. In some cases controlled demolitions are designed to lay buildings down on their sides. The control in controlled demolition lies in the ability to control the pattern and timing of the destruction to make the building fall as desired.

The most common type of controlled demolition of large urban structures is called implosion, but very different types of controlled demolitions are possible.

Implosions
A classic controlled demolition implosion not only brings a building down into its footprint, it causes the periphery of the building to fall inward, towards the building’s central vertical axis. Although controlled demolition implosions are not implosions in the literal sense of the word, since the do not use pressure differences to push a building’s exterior inward, they achieve a similar result by destroying structural components in a particular order. Given the structural designs typical of most large buildings, breaking that structure from inside to outside and from bottom to top will tend to implode a building.

Typical building implosions employ numerous small charges, totaling a modest quantity of explosives. Since small cutter charges are quite effective at slicing through steel members when properly installed facing them, it doesn’t take a large amount of explosvies to implode a skyscraper.

It does, however, require a large number of charges, since, not only is it necessary to sever all of a building’s support columns, it is necessary to do so with precise timing. The timing of the charges is critical to a successful implosion, since an asymmetries in the charge detonation will tend to make a building lean to the side being destroyed first.Controlled demolition experts boast about the technical complexity and precision required to pull off a successful implosion.

Anyone with rudimentary knowledge of blasting techniques can blow up a building. The Loizeauxs implode things down. They collapse a structure inward within its footprint or lay it down in a predetermined direction to avoid collateral damage to adjacent structures.

After a detailed structural analysis, they use a minimum amount of explosives strategically placed in holes drilled in critical support columns or strapped to support beams. These are detonated in an exquisitely timed sequence lasting from milliseconds to a full nine seconds. Weight and gravity do the rest.

Some Loizeaux techniques developed over the decades are proprietary and the principal reason for their commercial success and safety record. Their implosions have never caused a death or injury. 1  An implosion severs the columns at least at the ground level, and usually on multiple levels higher up in the building, particularly if the building is tall.Depending on the height of the structure, we’ll work on a couple of different floors—usually anywhere from two to six. The taller the building, the higher up we work.

We only really need to work on the first two floors, because you can make the building come down that way. 2  Because columns are often rigged on multiple levels, the number of charges in a typical demolition far outnumbers the number of columns.About 150 pounds of dynamite and plastic explosives divided into 650 charges will be placed in holes drilled into columns on the first, second, third, sixth and 10th floors of the building and set off with an electronic ignitor, said Doug Loizeaux, of Controlled Demolition Inc., of Phoenix, Md., the subcontractor for the implosion work. 3  

CDI placed 991 separate charges, about 800 lbs. of explosives in all, on seven floors from the basement to the 14th floor and detonated them over a five-second interval. 4  

The following table summarizes statistics about the deployment of explosives in a number of controlled demolitions documented by PhillyBlast.com. Although PhillyBlast.com does not document the number of columns in the buildings, it is clear that the number of charges vastly outnumbers them.structureheightdatechargesholeslocationscolumnstotal explosivesPhiladelphia Naval Hospital15 stories6/9/2001600200 lbs.Flag House Courts11 stories2/10/20011050200 lbs.Broadway Homes22 stories8/19/2000900200 lbs.Hollander Ridge Tower20 stories7/8/2001,16656403 lbs.Hayes Homes12 stories12/11/1999350120 lbs.Reading Grain Elevator235 feet2/28/1999300200 lbs.PennDOT Building12 stories8/1/19981,000240300 lbs.Jack Frost Sugar Refinery8 stories11/2/19974,000506700 lbs.5  Seismic Signatures

It is doubtful that the explosive detonations in a typical demolitions, being small, numerous, and staggered over time, would generate a seismic signals with much magnitude, but the secondary effects can. Ground coupled explosives can trigger earthquakes in regions with high crustal strain, such as Los Vegas, NV.But with the charges positioned above ground instead of within the crust — where the release of strain results in powerful earthquakes — the Aladdin implosion didn’t even register on the nearby seismograph at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, according to geology professor Dave Weide. 6  

Botched Demolitions A number of unsuccessful controlled demolitions attest to the fact that large buildings do not easily collapse, and that careful planning and execution is required to bring them down with explosives, despite the ability of explosives to cut through columns. In some cases buildings that were left standing by unsuccessful controlled demolitions had to be destroyed with wrecking balls.On June 29, 1997, the 10-floor Jack Frost Sugary Refinery withstood multiple attempts to destroy it with explosives. The factory building was destroyed six months later in a successful controlled demolition. 7  
The Zip Feeds Mill fell about two stories and then came to a halt, in response to a botched controlled demolition that did not adequately account and plan for the building’s strength.Another example is the failure of the Zip Feeds Mill Tower to collapse, even after it fell several stories.References

1. Holland Tunnel And Seattle Kingdome, [cached]
2. Interview with Stacey Loizeaux, pbs.org,
3. Implosion to turn Garfield Heights highrise to rubble, Pittsburgh Tribute-Review, [cached]
4. The Controlled Progressive Collapses of The Twin Towers, SueTheTerrorists.net, [cached]
5. Phillyblast Was Here, phillyblast.com, [cached]
6. If The Big One Hits Here, Will We Be Ready?, reviewjournal.com, 4/11/99 [cached]
7. Phillyblast Was Here …,

Unknown's avatar

About mekorganic

I have been a Peace and Social Justice Advocate most all of my adult life. In 2020 (7.4%) and 2022 (21%), I ran for U.S. Congress in CA under the Green Party. This Blog and website are meant to be a progressive educational site, an alternative to corporate media and the two dominate political parties. Your comments and participation are most appreciated. (Click photo) .............................................. Created and managed by Michael E. Kerr
This entry was posted in 911Truth Archive, WTC7.net and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment